The Golan Heights Peace Park?
You will probably have read about the secret and “unofficial” meetings between Syrians and Israelis - including, significantly, Dr. Alon Liel - which took place between September 2004 and July 2006, at which certain understandings for a peace agreement between Israel and Syria were formulated.
The Yaba Yaba blog has what it claims to be a September 2007 draft of the plan for a Golan Heights Peace Park, obtained from “a reliable channel” and “attributed to Dr Alon Liel”. Yaba Yaba says:
I found it hard to believe: an experienced diplomat like Dr Liel would not compromise the achievement of a century by leaking it to the Internet. The draft is dated sept. 2007. And above all, I find it incomprehensible that any of the Israeli or Syrian leaders would display enough creativity or imagination to be able to read such a proposal and fidn the dotted line. Still, a quick google run shows that it is not a complete urban myth.
Anyhow, here it is.
The Peace Park on the Golan
Draft – Sep.2007
The park on the Golan will be designed as a nature reserve, under Syrian sovereignty, stretching on about one third of the Golan Height territories, on the western zone close to the Kinneret (Sea of Galilee).
Israeli citizens will be allowed entry to the park, no visa required, from morning to evening, for tourist, ecological or humanitarian purposes, as agreed to by both sides.
Israeli citizens currently living on the territory to be defined in the future as the park land and who own economical, tourist, or agricultural businesses will be able to continue operating their businesses and even hold on to their business ownership on the condition that it is approved by both governments and if the nature of their business is not contradictory to the spirit of the park.
The supervision and safeguarding of the park will be carried out by Syrian nature reserve officials who will be partially armed with personal weapons only. Entry for tourist purposes will entail payment of fees. Authorized workers, whether Israelis or Syrians, will hold a permanent entry permit. Other routine operational regulations will be set by the park management in accordance with the Syrian Parks Authority.
Both governments, with the cooperation of the international community, will make special efforts to turn that park into a tourist attraction which will appeal to the citizens of all countries and will draw tourists from all over the world.
Initial planning of the park will be carried out by a leading international team. The planning will take into account long term ecological and environmental considerations as well as certain historical, political and humanitarian sensitivities on both sides. The international team will make recommendation to both parties on the exact location of the park. The two governments will be asked to approve the park area before detailed planning starts.
The spirit of the park should be the spirit of reconciliation between the two peoples. It will reflect the wish of both countries to co-exist in peace and to maintain maximal economical and tourist cooperation for their own sake. Top businessmen and economists from all over the world will act as an advisory team to the Syrian authorities in order to ensure that the park will eventually yield profits and will not need long- term governmental subsidization.
Both parties aspire to reach a situation in which appropriate existing infrastructures in the park will continue to function after the sovereignty is restored to Syria.
The water flow in the park will be controlled in a way that will guarantee that Israel will keep on receiving the same quantities of water from the Golan sources or through the Golan as at the time the agreement is signed by both parties.
The evacuation of the Israeli population living on the territory of the park will be carried out within 5 to15 years from the date the agreement is signed by both parties. Aside from park personnel, Syrians will not be allowed to establish permanent residence on park territory.
The park territory entirely will be a buffer zone free of weaponry and visitors will not be allowed to bring in weapons. Citizens holding guns will be required to deposit it at certain entry posts.
Every transgression of park regulations will be dealt by the park authorities. When juridical process is required it will be handled by Syrian authorities if it concerns Syrian citizens and foreign tourists. The agreement on the juridical aspect will be discussed in details by both parties at the time of signing the accord.
It sounds nice.
(Hat tip: Mira)
Comments
| 20 June 2008, 10:50 am |
And when Islamic terrorists carry out a raid and kill 100 tourists - it will close!
| 20 June 2008, 11:23 am |
The evacuation of the Israeli population living on the territory of the park will be carried out within 5 to 15 years from the date the agreement is signed by both parties
I disagree with that bit. Strongly.
You might as well as Morgoth’s lot to clear off out of Country Antrim so that my lot can have our access to the Giant’s Causeway less impeded by the potential sight of the odd scottish flag or occasional sash or red-white-and-blue kerbstone.
Co-existence is what needs to be promoted.
Otherwise (and although I try to be optimistic), what Maven said, unfortunately.
This sort of thing sounds all a bit unprecedented and unrealistic. I certainly couldn’t see it working in other disputed territories where there is as much fanaticism, nationalism and hatred abounding between rival groups (eg Nagorno-Karabakh), or where people are determined to live only with “their own kind” (see above)
| 20 June 2008, 12:06 pm |
I disagree with that bit. Strongly.
You can’t really compare a region captured 40 years ago to one settled 400 hundred years. And, if you counter “Well, it’s the principle of the thing”, that principle would then apply to 4 years or 4 months.
P.
| 20 June 2008, 12:11 pm |
I can’t for the life of me imagine how Syria would be able to handle peace with and recognition of Israel. After all then it would be incredibly difficult for it to justify the “state of emergency” which has been imposed on the Syrian constitution and is what keeps the Ba’ath party in power.
Not only that but it’s the last shred of legitimacy the Ba’athists have.
Also I can’t even for a minute imagine how the Syrian media will deal with such an event. Would the state run newspapers such as “October” which read like a Combat 18 publication, all of a sudden produce editorials saying “oooops! Looks like we were wrong. Sorry!”
I just can’t see it.
Syria also isn’t like the USSR in its last days - there is food on the table and while life is very difficult for a lot of people there isn’t any widespread destitution. Plus Syria put up with and survived much harsher conditions - such as during the 73 war where people went without food for days. Or even during Hafez Al-Assad’s reign where people used to go to Lebanon to get hold of staples such a bananas and tissues.
Although its infrastructure is at breaking point as indicated by the posters urging birth-control in a country the size of France but with a population of 18 million.
This whole thing seems like maneuvering, maybe so he can say (like his dad did in the 90’s) “Look, I tried, I’m not inflexible” - and then introduces crackdowns.
Though it would be nice if I was wrong. Alas sadly cynicism always tends to be correct when dealing with the ME.
| 20 June 2008, 12:25 pm |
“Paul Moloney
You can’t really compare a region captured 40 years ago to one settled 400 hundred years.”
I understand that the Golan was only awarded to (French) Syria by (British) Palestinian Mandate, upon the initial partition in 1921. So the Syrians only formally ‘owned’ it for 46 years, not 400. However, Syria only attained independence in 1946, so they only actually had control of it for 21 years, whereas the Israels have had it for 41 years, almost twice as long.
| 20 June 2008, 12:49 pm |
a country the size of France
Is each and every country in the Middle East, the same size as France? Is there a reason for this?
| 20 June 2008, 1:13 pm |
Sounds like a reasonable plan - if there were good will on the Syrian side, which I doubt.
| 20 June 2008, 1:20 pm |
Paul, the Jewish link is sonewhat older than 40 years. Plus, are you advocating the return of evacuated farmland in Fermanagh or Armagh to Prodestants who left a lot less than 40 years ago?
| 20 June 2008, 1:21 pm |
It sounds as nice as that Quaker painting, Davidg
Paul, the Jewish link is sonewhat older than 40 years. Plus, are you advocating the return of evacuated farmland in Fermanagh or Armagh to Prodestants who left a lot less than 40 years ago?
| 20 June 2008, 1:24 pm |
“You can’t really compare a region captured 40 years ago to one settled 400 hundred years”
Anybody who knows the Golan, knows Gamla. Ignorant.
| 20 June 2008, 1:34 pm |
I can’t find in the draft any mention to how many years the arrangement will give the Druze to start packing and go away from the Golan.
Anybody can instruct me?
Or only Jewish towns make the landscape of the “coexistence” park ugly?
This is garbage.
| 20 June 2008, 1:42 pm |
The trans-frontier peace park theme is really great, . Hope it can work here, at least at some stage.
There are 2 in SA - the Kalahari Transfrontier Park linking Botswana and SA and the Greater Limpopo, which has expanded the size of the Kruger park - already the size of Wales - by another 60% into Mosambique.
It’s due to incorporate parts of Gonarhezuzu in Zim too, when the political situation allows.
| 20 June 2008, 1:43 pm |
This is garbage.
Indeed. An no doubt naive pollyannas like S.O. Muffin will be lapping it up. Mind you, people like S.O. Muffin, always willing to appease their persecutors, would have been lapping up compliments from Nazi guards herding them into the gas chambers…
| 20 June 2008, 1:56 pm |
Someone do a dress-down Friday thread.
| 20 June 2008, 2:01 pm |
any long-term peace with Syria depends on a deal over the Golan
so if people want a continuous state of low level warfare for the next hundred years with Syria then they will oppose all and any deal over the Golan
however, should reality play a part in people’s deliberations on this matter then I’m sure that they would appreciate that some form of deal has to be made, eventually
that’s a choice, continued conflict with Syria or not
| 20 June 2008, 2:05 pm |
OT, Dress Down.
Martha Stewart banned from UK.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/787966/exclusive-martha-stewart-banned-from-britain-her-loss-or-ours.thtml
| 20 June 2008, 2:16 pm |
The problem as always is that both sides have a history of sneak attacks. But aside from that Israel has done better when attacked like that than the Arab world so they could give up the Golan Heights.
| 20 June 2008, 2:16 pm |
Is there anywhere in Syria that’s run anything like this, never mind looking at taking on the Golan? Is there anywhere where their “influence” on Lebanon has been exercised in this way? Ummmm, yeah….. It does sound like the very touching wishful thinking of those of Israel’s diplomatic corps who were installed in the days of the best of the Oslo Peace process. Maybe they have in mind inviting Sheikh Nasrallah and Khaled Meshaal, to say nothing of Assad’s bestest friend President Ahmedinejad to the opening ceremony?
| 20 June 2008, 2:21 pm |
I have a better idea. Israel will sign a peace treaty with the whole Arab world with which she is still at war.
We will build a coexistence park comprising Lebanon, Iraq and Syria.
The Arabs living there will be evacuated to the Arabian peninsulae.
Everybody will be happy.
Coexistence!
| 20 June 2008, 3:06 pm |
Alon Liel is a fool and is finished. The corrupt Olmert-led clique will soon be gone. The Golan is nice, is ours, was ours, and we’re keeping it.
Incidentally, for the wine-lovers among you, may I recommend the Gamla Cabernet Sauvignon? Just tremendous stuff, and a reason in itself to tell the Baathist dictatorship to go fuck itself.
| 20 June 2008, 3:06 pm |
Does Morgoth have any idea what a pollyanna is?
| 20 June 2008, 3:34 pm |
Lets replace Syria for Argentina. Israel for Great Britain. And the Golan for the Islas Malvinas.
What about such a nice agreement?
| 20 June 2008, 4:03 pm |
Does that mean I have to move to Israel, Fabian? Want to swap houses?
| 20 June 2008, 4:05 pm |
Pangloss, I don’t live in the Golan, but you could find a house in London, right? I mean, I don’t expect the Israelis in the Golan to be evacuated to the UK, so why would you go to live in Israel?
| 20 June 2008, 4:08 pm |
The more I read into it the more this “peace park” seems a non-starter. It seems odd that a peace deal with Israel has to include a deal on the Golan (which obviously it does) yet Syria and Turkey normalized relationships without any demands to hand over Hatay province (as it was known in Syria as Alexanderuna).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatay_Province#Turkish-Syrian_dispute_over_the_Hatay_Province
Then again the normalization of relations between Syria and Turkey happened after Turkey threatened to invade Syria unless it handed over the PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan (the ‘c’ is pronounced ‘j’)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/281302.stm
no compromises, no finding common ground, no talks. “Just hand him over or we invade. Oh and Hatay is ours, OK?”
And Syria retreated very quickly.
So why is it making such a noise over Golan when it surrendered any claims over Hatay without a fus?
| 20 June 2008, 4:09 pm |
edit: typo - fuss
| 20 June 2008, 4:17 pm |
except the population is Syrian, classic imperialism
| 20 June 2008, 4:20 pm |
Will remain a park until the Jewish/Zionist illegal habitants of Palestine fill the park will illegal cluster bombs, same bombs which have the USA flag across them
| 20 June 2008, 4:27 pm |
Morgoth - Mind you, people like S.O. Muffin, always willing to appease their persecutors, would have been lapping up compliments from Nazi guards herding them into the gas chambers…
As Muffin is one of the more reasonable and thoughtful posters on I/P on this site; I would have expected Morgoth the Ethnic Cleanser to have had a go at him. However, I’m quite surprised that nobody has pulled him up on his tasteless and offensive reference to the Holocaust.
One would have thought that an Irishman using a Holocaust comparison to insult a Jew would fall outside the bounds of decent discourse.
| 20 June 2008, 4:39 pm |
Godeosic, what’s the point?
One of the cafes on my street is run by a family from Hatay. Is this going to be the day Flanker learns about the patchwork of ethnic and language groups around there?
(Surely Ocalan was arrested in Kenya and flown to Turkey, where he started bleating about his Turkish mam?
| 20 June 2008, 4:47 pm |
pangloss
20 June 2008, 4:03 pm
Does that mean I have to move to Israel, Fabian? Want to swap houses?
Fabian from Israel
20 June 2008, 4:05 pm
Pangloss, I don’t live in the Golan, but you could find a house in London, right? I mean, I don’t expect the Israelis in the Golan to be evacuated to the UK, so why would you go to live in Israel?
And yet another attempt at humour fails.
Sigh
| 20 June 2008, 4:50 pm |
One would have thought that an Irishman using a Holocaust comparison to insult a Jew would fall outside the bounds of decent discourse.
S.O. Muffin has called repeatedly for courses of action which would leave the Jewish people defenceless and at the mercy of their enemies, all of whom have shown no hesitation in indulging in slaughter.
You would think, given the history of persecution that Jews have went though, and that now, for the first time in history, they have a place to call their own and don’t rely on the pernicious and fickle alleged-good will of their persecutors, that S.O. Muffin would support said Jewish homeland.
The comparison is not one I lightly made, but it reflects the gravity of the situation, and the completely adverse effect that would have on Israel, and indeed, Jews worldwide, if they were to take the S.O. Muffin line and abase themselves at the feet of the same ideologies that produced and nutured the Holocaust.
So my comparison is quite accurate. In short, anyone who supports this ludricrous proposal is a traitor to both the Jewish people and to Israel. In the 1940s, he/she would be a collaborator with the Nazis.
The Golan Heights must remain wholly a part of Israel, full stop.
| 20 June 2008, 4:59 pm |
Muffin lost far more rellies to A. Hitler than your town would have to the INLA and IRA.
| 20 June 2008, 5:01 pm |
Then why is he now advocating a course of action that would make him lose MORE relatives to the new Hitlers?
| 20 June 2008, 5:03 pm |
To recap: why are the proponents of this idea advocating national suicide for Israel?
| 20 June 2008, 5:07 pm |
That’s right, Jews who don’t think the way you decree are no better than Nazi appeasers. I mean, fuck off.
| 20 June 2008, 5:09 pm |
Over 2000 years of anti-semitism has shown that I am correct, ‘Cunt’. The only place on Earth where Jews will be safe is in a strong, undefeated Israel willing to defend itself and its people.
| 20 June 2008, 5:14 pm |
well I tend to agree with you - but isnt that guy youre talking about a Jew who left Israel? - so you should hardly be surprised if he feels differently.
| 20 June 2008, 5:19 pm |
S.O. Muffin has called repeatedly for courses of action which would leave the Jewish people defenceless and at the mercy of their enemies, all of whom have shown no hesitation in indulging in slaughter.
Any evidence for this ludicrous assertion?
You would think, given the history of persecution that Jews have went though, and that now, for the first time in history, they have a place to call their own
Shurely shome mistake? I seem to remember learning about ancient kings of Israel such as David and Solomon and something about a Temple in Jerusalem.
The comparison is not one I lightly made, but it reflects the gravity of the situation, and the completely adverse effect that would have on Israel, and indeed, Jews worldwide, if they were to take the S.O. Muffin line and abase themselves at the feet of the same ideologies that produced and nutured the Holocaust. So my comparison is quite accurate
Again with the trivialisation of the Holocaust. I am at a loss to understand how an Israel armed with nuclear weapons versus a bunch of Mediaevalists toting home made rockets is in some way comparable to the Holocaust. Especially when the Israelis have the unstinting support of the world’s only superpower.
The Golan Heights must remain wholly a part of Israel, full stop.
The annexation of the Golan Heights is not internationally recognized and United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 considers the area part of the Israeli occupied territories. They might remain under Israeli occupation, but no other nation considers them part of Israel, wholly or not.
| 20 June 2008, 5:38 pm |
Where’s one of those pinpoint units Muffin likes so much when we need them?
| 20 June 2008, 5:41 pm |
They might remain under Israeli occupation, but no other nation considers them part of Israel, wholly or not.
Is Israel went by what “other nations” wanted, they’d be no Jews, alas.
| 20 June 2008, 5:51 pm |
I’m sure you’d find another Sims people to save from sebuku.
Muffin’s lost more mates and lesser comrades in combat and daily life than your town has to the INLA and IRA.
| 20 June 2008, 5:56 pm |
I agree with Morgoth, Israel has too high a value to Jews ( even if many of them dont realise it ), to allow its existence to be chipped away bit by bit for reasons which owe more to the naivity of well meaning jews, many of who live abroad.
As Mark Steyn wrote Anti Semitism didnt get to be the longest hatred without being adaptable.
| 20 June 2008, 5:58 pm |
Muffin’s lost more mates and lesser comrades in combat and daily life than your town has to the INLA and IRA.
Which is totally irrelevant to the point at hand.
Sacrificing the Golan heights will, as #1 points out, not change a single thing other than placing Syrian artillery even closer to Jerusalem.
| 20 June 2008, 6:10 pm |
I must have missed the bit when, regardless of the rights and wrongs of this, militarisation of Golan was on the cards, or anyone would seriously expect Israel to sit on her hands if it started. Nuclear reactors, anyone?
Thank Christ for DaveM. If not, you and Seymour would make me think Ulster Prods are maniacs.
| 20 June 2008, 6:27 pm |
or anyone would seriously expect Israel to sit on her hands if it started.
Frankly, yes. Lets face it, to most of the planet, the only good Jew is a dead or suffering one. And its been like that for millenia.
| 20 June 2008, 6:29 pm |
sigh, Morgoth reminds me of the TheIrie, smart but intemperate, frothing at the mouth and attacking decent Israelis, making ludicrous comparisons and sounding more and more like Dr Paisley on speed with each passing day
his comments concerning Muffin are beyond the pale and anywhere else they would probably ban him for a few months whilst he went into rehab
sadly I think David T’s too liberal for that
| 20 June 2008, 6:34 pm |
his comments concerning Muffin are beyond the pale
Pointing out that the positions that Modernity and the likes of him hold would lead inevitably lead to the destruction of Israel and the persecution of Jews around the world is beyond the pale?
Your definition of the Hinterlands of Dublin are fucked up, Modernity.
| 20 June 2008, 6:42 pm |
Whoops, “that Muffin and…”
Actually, given your posts above, you’re another one of the Chamberlain brigade…
| 20 June 2008, 7:03 pm |
It is your anti-Semitism that is beyond the pale Morgoth.
Examples from the EUMC Working Definition of Antisemitism included in the Report of the All-Party Parliamentary Inquiry into Antisemitism are in bold.
Morgoth 1:43 pm today
…Mind you, people like S.O. Muffin, always willing to appease their persecutors, would have been lapping up compliments from Nazi guards herding them into the gas chambers…
Morgoth, 4:50 pm today
… a traitor to both the Jewish people and to Israel. In the 1940s, he/she would be a collaborator with the Nazis.
I’d say those remarks were bothmaking mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews AND denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination since Muffin should be able to call for dialogue without being branded a Nazi collaborator and traitor.
Morgoth, 3pm today
History has shown us the utter evil of monotheism, in all forms. And the sooner it is purged from this planet the better.
As Judaism is one of the world’s oldest montheistic religions, I’d say that fell into the category ofcalling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
David Rosenberg was right when he said;
“Ironically, those who claim that the Jewish right to self-determination is under attack simultaneously deplore individual Jewish self-determination.”
http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/06/09/jewish-self-determination/
You, Morgoth, are an anti-Semite.
| 20 June 2008, 7:03 pm |
I have to say that I too found Morgoth’s words a trivialization of the Holocaust. The situation is not comparable, Morgoth.
I am against the ceding of the Golan, but that doesn’t mean I consider SO Muffin as a “traitor” to the Jewish people.
You have to learn to be more nuanced.
Best
Fabian
| 20 June 2008, 7:05 pm |
But Geodesic, 20 June 2008, 7:03 pm your last point is absurd. You are comparing papas with manzanas (potatoes with apples).
| 20 June 2008, 7:54 pm |
You have to learn to be more nuanced.
When confronted with the oldest hatred in the world, Fabian, can we afford to be “nuanced”? Nuance is for reasoned political debate. Anti-semitism isn’t reasoned.
| 20 June 2008, 7:55 pm |
You, Morgoth, are an anti-Semite.
I thought I’d heard it all.
Next I’ll be called a “decent”.
oh wait…
| 20 June 2008, 8:01 pm |
Unlike Morgoth, muffin has actually laid his life on the line in wars to defend Israel, in which lost close friends.
I remember my relief when Morgoth bid adieu to these comments boxes a few months ago in what I (over-optimistically) took to be a decisive and final break. I’m not sure what drew him back, but whatever it was, I wish it hadn’t happened.
| 20 June 2008, 8:05 pm |
Unlike Morgoth, muffin has actually laid his life on the line in wars to defend Israel, in which lost close friends.
Why Gene, I didn’t know you were such a Heinleinologist.
I’m not sure what drew him back, but whatever it was,I wish it hadn’t happened.
Its because you guys are such fun.
And the fact, that if everyone thought like you Gene, the world would be a much more boring place.
| 20 June 2008, 8:08 pm |
Morgoth: SO Muffin is not an antisemite.
I didn’t call him one. “Uncle Tom”ish tendancies might be a better description. Seeking to make accommodation with people who cannot be accommodated with, and grasping at ludicrious straws. Such as, I recall, the current Hudna in Gaza.
| 20 June 2008, 8:20 pm |
Dead Jew are Good Jews to Morgoth because he can decree himself the only one who could have saved them.
| 20 June 2008, 8:24 pm |
I refer MNACBIANM to my 5:09 pm post above.
| 20 June 2008, 8:29 pm |
I thought Modernity was talking about Poland.
| 20 June 2008, 8:36 pm |
Yeah, Morgie! You’re immune from accusations of antisemitism because… you say so! Whom does this remind me of?
| 20 June 2008, 9:54 pm |
Next, MNACBIANM will be accusing Brownie of hating the Labour Party….
| 20 June 2008, 10:16 pm |
Like Peace Island between Jordan and Israel that was the site of a terror attack by a moonlighting Jordanian Border Policeman in the 90s?
| 21 June 2008, 4:17 am |
Eurosabra: Wasn’t that where the terrorist was supposedly offended by the scantly clad Israeli women?
Note: the Golan Heights Peace Park sounds like a great idea as long as all the tourists can go there armed in full combat gear!
| 21 June 2008, 6:09 am |
The Golan Heights Peace Park sounds about as likely to happen as having the Miss Universe Beauty Contest in Vietnam!
| 21 June 2008, 10:51 pm |
A “Peace” Park on the Golan Heights.? MWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
| 22 June 2008, 1:44 am |
“Fabian from Israel
20 June 2008, 3:34 pm
Lets replace Syria for Argentina. Israel for Great Britain. And the Golan for the Islas Malvinas.
What about such a nice agreement?”
Yes, let’s:-
1. Argentina took the Malvinas off us. So Argentina has to stand for Israel not the UK doesn’t it?
2. British people have virtually no attachment to the Falklands apart from the fact that British people were being trampled all over by a military junta. Prior to that the UK government was inching towards some sort of settlement.
3. Personally I have no problem with reaching an agreement with Argentina. The history over the Falklands/Malvinas is far more complicated than the Golan Heights. I think with the Falklands a codominium arrangement is the way forward with Argentina having a
lead position in the West Falklands and the UK retaining its sway over the east. However, as with Syria, Argentina would have to give a serious demonstration of peaceful intent before we ventured down that road.
| 22 June 2008, 6:47 am |
Field: 1, no it didn’t. You took the Malvinas from Argentina.
2. I don’t know. It didn’t look like and it doesn’t look like.
3. the point of the comparison was that in the Golan proposal, Jews must be evacuated. I made the comparison for people in this blog to think whether they would accept a Malvinas accord in which the Kelpers/English are all evacuated.
Best.
Fabian
| 22 June 2008, 3:17 pm |
Settlers must be evacuated, big difference, just because you steal a car does not mean taking that car away from you is stealing it back.
| 23 June 2008, 7:35 pm |
David All: Yes, the standards for “tznius” among Orthodox Jewish schoolgirls are not sufficient according to Islam. What was really disturbing was the public support for the killer at the trial, as detailed in Fouad Ajami’s _The Dream Palace of the Arabs_. Makes it clear that the peace with Jordan will last only as long as the power of the Hashemite family running Palestinian Jordan.
| 23 June 2008, 7:35 pm |
David All: Yes, the standards for “tznius” among Orthodox Jewish schoolgirls are not sufficient according to Islam. What was really disturbing was the public support for the killer at the trial, as detailed in Fouad Ajami’s _The Dream Palace of the Arabs_. Makes it clear that the peace with Jordan will last only as long as the power of the Hashemite family running Palestinian Jordan.
| 24 June 2008, 12:56 am |
Thanks, Eurosabra. I did not remember it was Orthodox Jewish schoolgirls who were the victims of that terrorist attack.


Write a comment