Magyar Garda on the march
Mikey read an article I wrote for the spring issue of Dissent about the Magyar Garda (Hungarian Guard), a new Hungarian far-right group and asked me to post something on the subject. The Garda is the new face of extremism: very image conscious, well advised legally and extremely internet savvy. The Garda avoids open anti-Semitism, indeed even denies it is anti-Semitic, but focuses on anti-Roma sentiment, a fertile ground in a region where hatred of Roma is open and widespread. It’s trying to build links with the BNP, as its parent party’s website shows. The government is trying to ban the Garda on the ground of incitement to racial hatred. I don’t think they will succeed. After fifty years of dictatorship there is a real reluctance in this country to restrict freedom of speech, no matter how unpleasant the views being expressed.
You can read the article here, it’s long - 3,500 words.
Comments
| 1 July 2008, 5:10 pm |
V. interesting article, Adam
| 1 July 2008, 6:35 pm |
Thanks Adam. I noticed that Dissent now have it on their web site. I was sickened to read that there is a group calling itself “Arrows of Hungarian National Liberation Army.” As you point out yourself it is not a coincidence that the word “Arrows” is part of the groups name. Anyone who has studied the Holocaust in Hungary in late 1944 and early 1945 will know exactly what the Arrow Cross were responsible for back then.
Adam’s article has been published in Dissent which is a superb magazine. I have been a subscriber for some time now and they always have interesting articles. I urge everyone to take out a subscription!
| 1 July 2008, 10:54 pm |
Very interesting article.
I heard Roger Griffin speak on modernism and fascism a while back. He was absolutely brilliant and I’m going to get his book. He points out (and I simplify) that nobody talks about degenerate Jews any more, and if you try to recognise fascists that way you miss the urbane and politic leaders like Gabor Vona, leader of Jobbik and Magyar Garda. What gives these people away is a yearning for over-arching narratives explaining the world, and an expectation that you can clean up society - Griffin pointed out the prevalence of the ‘gardening’ metaphor and the necessity of burning weeds.
What chills and sickens is that discrimination against Roma is so open ie acceptable.
Berlosconi in Italy - it’s OK to fingerprint Roma children because they’re all thieves.
| 2 July 2008, 2:08 am |
Mira - Get the book, its probably the most important piece of historical writing since Furet. Griffin calls parties such as the FN and the like ethno-cratic liberals, all vive la difference but basically still obessed with the purity of the ethnie, of a supra-individual identity and with decadence.
There was a Sythe Guard, I believe, in Hungary during the mid thirties, a peasant fascist group, though soon subsumed by the run away success of the Arros Cross by the end of the decade after the failure of their putsch
| 2 July 2008, 8:18 am |
Thanks for the tip about Roger Griffin. I did not know about his book but now definitely read it. HP at its best - intelligent informed comment.
| 2 July 2008, 9:23 am |
Adam (and Mira) - Here a fairly comprehesive list of his stuff - http://ah.brookes.ac.uk/index.php/staff/details/griffin/
| 2 July 2008, 9:41 am |
Mira: Berlosconi in Italy - it’s OK to fingerprint Roma children because they’re all thieves.
Most of the HP bloggers seem to have no problem with fingerprinting, so I doubt this will be seen as an issue.
| 2 July 2008, 10:26 am |
Dirigible, I don’t claim to have concentrated much on fingerprinting, but if a state decides to do it either directly or indirectly on an ethnic basis, that’s trouble.
| 2 July 2008, 10:28 am |
Thanks for the pointers, socialrepublican.
| 2 July 2008, 1:57 pm |
Adam,
Also (and you might have it already), Stanley Payne’s a History of Fascism is a must
| 2 July 2008, 5:26 pm |
@Adam’s explanation “After fifty years of dictatorship there is a real reluctance in this country to restrict freedom of speech, no matter how unpleasant the views being expressed.” is telling us, to incite hatred is just unpleasant, it is the typical prejudice of left-liberal people, who live in the west.
In a country like Hungary, where with the help of Hungarian administration about half a million Jews were deported to Auschwitz-Birkenau, where most of them were murdered, it is dangerous to allow hate speech and it is a real miracle, that until now no Roma or Jew have been murdered.
After the change of system in 1989 the liberals - many of them of Jewish descent - stood up against any legislation curbing the activities of the extreme right. They thought that Hungary will become like the United States, where some of them were invited by George Soros. The problem of course is, that the USA have an entirely different history and political culture.
The Hungarians would have been well advised to learn from the Austrian and German experience, where no paramilitary groups are legal and where the denial of the National Socialist crimes are forbidden.
Thanks also to the Hungarian liberals, one can deny in Hungary those crimes and even justify them.
| 2 July 2008, 11:37 pm |
Nagy Talavera’s The Green Shirts and the Others is old and a little confused conceptually but still a mine of information about Fascism and the radical right in Hungary and Romania.
As an aside, Marius Turda’s work on Hungarian eugenists and the far right is worth a look too, tho in the interests of full disclosure, he was my dis super


Write a comment