<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nick Cohen: Demos and IslamExpo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/</link>
	<description>Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don&#039;t want to hear</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:01:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Young</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-215335</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-215335</guid>
		<description>If anyone is a fanatic it is Nick Cohen and his paranoid McCarthyite rantings.

Remember the 70s stereotype of the Citizen Smith type school boy revolutionary? Everybody was a Fascist,  the park keeper, the headmaster, the Tories, business people.

Step forward Nick Cohen; Ba&#039;athist secularists- Arab Fascists, Sunni radicals-Islamo-Nazis, Shia revolutionaries-the incarnation of Hitler, China and Putin&#039;s Russia-not Islamic but Fascists and dangerous foreigners all the same.

This complex world is a simple place for Nick Cohen, any event, movement, conflict or ideology can just be explained by comparing it to Europe in the 30s. Whether Tory grandees, liberals or socialists, anyone who believes the West should step back and take a sober long term view of this changing world is a Chamberlain type appeaser.

I suspect Cohen is a former student Trot, who has read his Theory of Permenant Revolution and adapted it to indulge the Blair regime&#039;s Gladstonian liberal imperialism, on its Neo-Con mission to bring civilisation to Johnny Foreigner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone is a fanatic it is Nick Cohen and his paranoid McCarthyite rantings.</p>
<p>Remember the 70s stereotype of the Citizen Smith type school boy revolutionary? Everybody was a Fascist,  the park keeper, the headmaster, the Tories, business people.</p>
<p>Step forward Nick Cohen; Ba&#8217;athist secularists- Arab Fascists, Sunni radicals-Islamo-Nazis, Shia revolutionaries-the incarnation of Hitler, China and Putin&#8217;s Russia-not Islamic but Fascists and dangerous foreigners all the same.</p>
<p>This complex world is a simple place for Nick Cohen, any event, movement, conflict or ideology can just be explained by comparing it to Europe in the 30s. Whether Tory grandees, liberals or socialists, anyone who believes the West should step back and take a sober long term view of this changing world is a Chamberlain type appeaser.</p>
<p>I suspect Cohen is a former student Trot, who has read his Theory of Permenant Revolution and adapted it to indulge the Blair regime&#8217;s Gladstonian liberal imperialism, on its Neo-Con mission to bring civilisation to Johnny Foreigner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-208046</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-208046</guid>
		<description>El Gordo - what did you make of Tamimi&#039;s statement that the Hamas charter is its biggest problem - and that many of the senior leadership agree that it is? I haven&#039;t followed him closely enough (and I mean in the metaphorical not special branch sense) to know if he says these sorts of things regularly in public, or whether he was just trying to get in with the more sceptical portion of the audience? I presume that this represents the division between the more politically oriented parts of the organization who realise they just look stupid citing not only the protocols of the elders of zion but also attacking the Lions and Rotary in their charter, and harder line elements who won&#039;t make any concessions to allow more political engagement.  I thought that his statement that Hamas will never accepts Israel&#039;s right to exists, but does accept it existence was interesting. Perhaps a realisation by some that they are never going to &#039;win&#039; in the current environment.

I agree with your comments on the Expo more widely. I suspect many who came wouldn&#039;t have realised the political affiliation of the organizers, because they didn&#039;t make much difference either way. As I&#039;ve written on my own blog, the timing of launching the libel action against this blog was doubly self defeating because they had actually got some critical voices for the debates, Bright, Murray (and had asked Nick Cohen) - because the debates would have been better if those people had been involved. The Friday night debate on media was interesting because Andrew Gilligan gave a good counter point argument. I&#039;m not a Londoner so never read him in the Standard but came away from that debate with a higher opinion of him than I had previously - and perhaps unfairly - held.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Gordo &#8211; what did you make of Tamimi&#8217;s statement that the Hamas charter is its biggest problem &#8211; and that many of the senior leadership agree that it is? I haven&#8217;t followed him closely enough (and I mean in the metaphorical not special branch sense) to know if he says these sorts of things regularly in public, or whether he was just trying to get in with the more sceptical portion of the audience? I presume that this represents the division between the more politically oriented parts of the organization who realise they just look stupid citing not only the protocols of the elders of zion but also attacking the Lions and Rotary in their charter, and harder line elements who won&#8217;t make any concessions to allow more political engagement.  I thought that his statement that Hamas will never accepts Israel&#8217;s right to exists, but does accept it existence was interesting. Perhaps a realisation by some that they are never going to &#8216;win&#8217; in the current environment.</p>
<p>I agree with your comments on the Expo more widely. I suspect many who came wouldn&#8217;t have realised the political affiliation of the organizers, because they didn&#8217;t make much difference either way. As I&#8217;ve written on my own blog, the timing of launching the libel action against this blog was doubly self defeating because they had actually got some critical voices for the debates, Bright, Murray (and had asked Nick Cohen) &#8211; because the debates would have been better if those people had been involved. The Friday night debate on media was interesting because Andrew Gilligan gave a good counter point argument. I&#8217;m not a Londoner so never read him in the Standard but came away from that debate with a higher opinion of him than I had previously &#8211; and perhaps unfairly &#8211; held.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Gordo</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-207615</link>
		<dc:creator>El Gordo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-207615</guid>
		<description>I went to IslamExpo.  I think the picture that emerged from the debates was much more complicated than most people would imagine.  It certainly wasn&#039;t the orgy of &quot;Jew-hatred&quot; or celebration of violence that you might imagine from some parts of the press.  In the conference on political Islam, we had a conscious effort by a range of prominent Islamists to explain their viewpoint - the discussion was heavily focussed on what you might call typical &quot;Western&quot; concerns about Islamism, like political violence, apostacy, the hijab, homosexuality and the treatment of women.  Nonetheless it was very illuminating and quite often surprising.  

What was and is clear is the &quot;credibility gap&quot; that exists in relation to Islamism.  It seems clear that there Islamist political parties which appear to be moderate: the Turkish AKP, the Moroccan PJD and, yes, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.  However, none of these have been permitted untrammelled political power since there are far too many vested interests in these countries, and too much fear of religious repression, for anyone to know whether moderate Islamism can work in practice.

My instinct is that Islamism -paradoxically- is becoming an increasingly non-violent movement.  People have seen the excesses of the GIA in Algeria, the jihadist groups in Egypt and AQ, and they are turning against it.  Did you know that support for Al-Qaeda has dropped massively in Pakistan during the last twelve months?  An entirely theoretical jihad is fine until they start car-bombing your own country.  

You have to understand that while many Muslims in this country support Hezbollah and Hamas as what they perceive to be, rightly or wrongly, legitimate resistance organisations (hence the flags on sale at the IHRC stall), this does not extend to other organisations.  Islamism as an idea has changed and is changing - and IslamExpo was a great opportunity to come and listen to some of these issues being debated.  Well done Demos and Catherine Fieschi.  I only wish Martin Bright and Douglas Murray had attended to give an alternative viewpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to IslamExpo.  I think the picture that emerged from the debates was much more complicated than most people would imagine.  It certainly wasn&#8217;t the orgy of &#8220;Jew-hatred&#8221; or celebration of violence that you might imagine from some parts of the press.  In the conference on political Islam, we had a conscious effort by a range of prominent Islamists to explain their viewpoint &#8211; the discussion was heavily focussed on what you might call typical &#8220;Western&#8221; concerns about Islamism, like political violence, apostacy, the hijab, homosexuality and the treatment of women.  Nonetheless it was very illuminating and quite often surprising.  </p>
<p>What was and is clear is the &#8220;credibility gap&#8221; that exists in relation to Islamism.  It seems clear that there Islamist political parties which appear to be moderate: the Turkish AKP, the Moroccan PJD and, yes, the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.  However, none of these have been permitted untrammelled political power since there are far too many vested interests in these countries, and too much fear of religious repression, for anyone to know whether moderate Islamism can work in practice.</p>
<p>My instinct is that Islamism -paradoxically- is becoming an increasingly non-violent movement.  People have seen the excesses of the GIA in Algeria, the jihadist groups in Egypt and AQ, and they are turning against it.  Did you know that support for Al-Qaeda has dropped massively in Pakistan during the last twelve months?  An entirely theoretical jihad is fine until they start car-bombing your own country.  </p>
<p>You have to understand that while many Muslims in this country support Hezbollah and Hamas as what they perceive to be, rightly or wrongly, legitimate resistance organisations (hence the flags on sale at the IHRC stall), this does not extend to other organisations.  Islamism as an idea has changed and is changing &#8211; and IslamExpo was a great opportunity to come and listen to some of these issues being debated.  Well done Demos and Catherine Fieschi.  I only wish Martin Bright and Douglas Murray had attended to give an alternative viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack R</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-207437</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-207437</guid>
		<description>I think that one of the problems for section of the British &#039;left&#039; in dealing with  historical and philosophical information about Islam is that such information is inclined to be filtered via Muslims. I think that the British left should pay more attention to ex-Muslims in this.

    While commenters at &#039;Harry&#039;s Place&#039; have started to see through the &#039;multiculturalism&#039; of Demos, and can see the threatening intentions of the Muslim Brotherhood, the British &#039;left&#039; is still inclined to be unreasoningly hostile to such anti -Jihad sites, as &#039;Jihadwatch&#039;, which supports several ex-Muslims, such as Ibn Warraq:
 www.jihadwatch.org

 While warmly appreciating Nick Cohen&#039;s campaign against what he sees as a &#039;Left-Islamist&#039; nexus (I call it a &#039;Left-Islam&#039; nexus), I think that he has illusions about &#039;Muslim Socialists&#039;, which to me is an oxymoron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that one of the problems for section of the British &#8216;left&#8217; in dealing with  historical and philosophical information about Islam is that such information is inclined to be filtered via Muslims. I think that the British left should pay more attention to ex-Muslims in this.</p>
<p>    While commenters at &#8216;Harry&#8217;s Place&#8217; have started to see through the &#8216;multiculturalism&#8217; of Demos, and can see the threatening intentions of the Muslim Brotherhood, the British &#8216;left&#8217; is still inclined to be unreasoningly hostile to such anti -Jihad sites, as &#8216;Jihadwatch&#8217;, which supports several ex-Muslims, such as Ibn Warraq:<br />
 <a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.jihadwatch.org</a></p>
<p> While warmly appreciating Nick Cohen&#8217;s campaign against what he sees as a &#8216;Left-Islamist&#8217; nexus (I call it a &#8216;Left-Islam&#8217; nexus), I think that he has illusions about &#8216;Muslim Socialists&#8217;, which to me is an oxymoron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sackcloth and ashes</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-207380</link>
		<dc:creator>sackcloth and ashes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-207380</guid>
		<description>&#039;The sad thing about JohnG is that he was all over the web defending Tamimi despite his racism and anti semitism, even though he himself didn’t join Respect.
Of course when the split came, Tamimi endorsed Galloway in the london Elections, refused to touch any of the Left List and German made her extremists have gone off with Galloway comment.
Thus JohnG is left with a record of pandering to anti semitism and racism, all for nothing.&#039;

Yeah, I mean he could have devoted his time to doing something more productive. Like completing his PhD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The sad thing about JohnG is that he was all over the web defending Tamimi despite his racism and anti semitism, even though he himself didn’t join Respect.<br />
Of course when the split came, Tamimi endorsed Galloway in the london Elections, refused to touch any of the Left List and German made her extremists have gone off with Galloway comment.<br />
Thus JohnG is left with a record of pandering to anti semitism and racism, all for nothing.&#8217;</p>
<p>Yeah, I mean he could have devoted his time to doing something more productive. Like completing his PhD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man in a Shed</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-207201</link>
		<dc:creator>Man in a Shed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-207201</guid>
		<description>A lot of questions that don&#039;t seem to be answerable with the facts as presented Nick. Perhaps one of your starting assumptions, the one about Demos, is wrong.

You suggest that the true nature of IslamExpo is hidden, what if they aren&#039;t the only ones ? If you make that assumption a lot of your questions are easily answered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of questions that don&#8217;t seem to be answerable with the facts as presented Nick. Perhaps one of your starting assumptions, the one about Demos, is wrong.</p>
<p>You suggest that the true nature of IslamExpo is hidden, what if they aren&#8217;t the only ones ? If you make that assumption a lot of your questions are easily answered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trundlemaster</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-207164</link>
		<dc:creator>Trundlemaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-207164</guid>
		<description>Mike said: &quot;Watch out, Milne&#039;s about!&quot;

Dear oh dear Milne seems to have really lost it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike said: &#8220;Watch out, Milne&#8217;s about!&#8221;</p>
<p>Dear oh dear Milne seems to have really lost it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-207090</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-207090</guid>
		<description>Watch out, Milne&#039;s about!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/17/islam.race</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch out, Milne&#8217;s about!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/17/islam.race" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/17/islam.race</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hasan prishtina</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-207066</link>
		<dc:creator>hasan prishtina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-207066</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;you really think its possible that Demos would ever consider going to a WhiteBritExpo to discuss the issues of the white working class with the BNP ?&lt;/i&gt;

Well, let&#039;s see. The BNP run an event called the Red, White and Blue Festival and Demos is surely interested in the recent popularity of the far right in Labour constituencies. I&#039;m sure Nick Griffin would be eager to get a call from Demos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>you really think its possible that Demos would ever consider going to a WhiteBritExpo to discuss the issues of the white working class with the BNP ?</i></p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s see. The BNP run an event called the Red, White and Blue Festival and Demos is surely interested in the recent popularity of the far right in Labour constituencies. I&#8217;m sure Nick Griffin would be eager to get a call from Demos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/comment-page-2/#comment-207065</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hurryupharry.org/2008/07/16/nick-cohen-demos-and-islamexpo/#comment-207065</guid>
		<description>Stringer Bell - I sympathize with your position. I was also at IslamExpo for my own research so probably walked by your stall. I went both to see the public lectures and the Political Islam seminar (and now having seen his picture realise I was sitting in the same row as James Brandon from Centre for Social Cohesion - hello James). With the public lectures, I wanted to see what the audience was saying as well as what the was said up on the big stage. Some voices from the floor were scary - the loon who was going on about &quot;the Zionist threat&quot; and then some were ordinary people reflecting an everyday decency in their questions, and asking nothing more of people like Seamus Milne (boring BTW, made the same speech twice) and Rageh Omar than how best to complain to the editor if they think a news story is unfair, which seems like a pretty British way of going about your politics. The main expo was a mixed bag - stalls like yours and fire safety, and then book shops selling ridiculous conspiracy theory books blaming all terrorism on Jews, the Islamic Human Rights Commission stand with a Hezbollah flag on it, then the bloke selling double glazing!?

Funny thing was, getting back to your question I&#039;m not sure how many from the ethnic minorities you were interested in targetting were there? It felt very &#039;London&#039; - quite Arab, quite middle class - less South Asian. That might not be true amongst the public visiting - perhaps my impression was wrong - and they had 30 000 or something through the doors, but it definitely was the case with the organisers. I was talking to another West Midlander and both of us had noted how, unlike, say the Brum Muslim community the whole event was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stringer Bell &#8211; I sympathize with your position. I was also at IslamExpo for my own research so probably walked by your stall. I went both to see the public lectures and the Political Islam seminar (and now having seen his picture realise I was sitting in the same row as James Brandon from Centre for Social Cohesion &#8211; hello James). With the public lectures, I wanted to see what the audience was saying as well as what the was said up on the big stage. Some voices from the floor were scary &#8211; the loon who was going on about &#8220;the Zionist threat&#8221; and then some were ordinary people reflecting an everyday decency in their questions, and asking nothing more of people like Seamus Milne (boring BTW, made the same speech twice) and Rageh Omar than how best to complain to the editor if they think a news story is unfair, which seems like a pretty British way of going about your politics. The main expo was a mixed bag &#8211; stalls like yours and fire safety, and then book shops selling ridiculous conspiracy theory books blaming all terrorism on Jews, the Islamic Human Rights Commission stand with a Hezbollah flag on it, then the bloke selling double glazing!?</p>
<p>Funny thing was, getting back to your question I&#8217;m not sure how many from the ethnic minorities you were interested in targetting were there? It felt very &#8216;London&#8217; &#8211; quite Arab, quite middle class &#8211; less South Asian. That might not be true amongst the public visiting &#8211; perhaps my impression was wrong &#8211; and they had 30 000 or something through the doors, but it definitely was the case with the organisers. I was talking to another West Midlander and both of us had noted how, unlike, say the Brum Muslim community the whole event was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
