Harry's Place

This is all reminiscent of the last days of Livingstone – remember Lee Jasper?

Gordon Brown is finished along with his Islamocraven Labour government.

Do we really have to wait another year?

If the man is a masochist, he must be having a great weekend.

I do not want to hear anybody use the neolygsm, ‘Islamocraven’ again. It makes you look like a loon.

I also don’t want to see any discussion of ‘Islamocravenness’

Poor Kate Garaghty! And, she seems such a nice woman on the GMTV sofa. Very proud of their baby.

“actually, no, he wanted to take me to the Atlantic first because he’s such a naff, arriviste northern monkey he thought that was classy”

Good heavens, the barbarity of the provincials! How fortunate that you are a Socialist and accept the foibles of these poor unfortunates.

David, could I also suggest that Field’s attempts to crow-bar in the fluffy-haired pal of Belgian fascists are pruned?

Field,

Go away.

naff, arriviste northern monkey

This is extremely offensive and I can’t imagine you’d get away with substituting a nationality for ‘northern’ without cries of ‘racist’…

Are you Mrs Lula ‘Mestizo’ de Silva?

DavidT – Then please suggest a suitable adjective for a party which (with a few honourable exceptions such as Blears) is under the thumb of the Islamist/SWP alliance

Neil D. –

Why? You appear to be positioning yourself as an opponent of smear tactics.

Yet you couldn’t even be bothered to defend your smear of Wilders.

I think such a disregard for a fellow democrat under sentence of death by a violent totalitarian movement is to say the least suspect.

I don’t care if I’m banned by the way Alec – that would simply prove how ludicrous the Harry’s Place slogan has become.

I do not want to hear anybody use the neolygsm, ‘Islamocraven’ again. It makes you look like a loon.

Well I think it’s rather good, even apt in certain circumstances – Red-Ken and Green-Qaradawi rather spring to mind. But do please clarify David, is this a humble view sent into the ether or yet another of those edicts?

Islamocraven would be a fine name were the Cypriot cigarettes be sold in, say, Lebanon or (even better, as a symbol of reconciliation) in Turkey. As a political term it’s… so naff even Dolly Draper would think it a bad idea.

Islamocraven?

Funny, I’d never have put you down as an islamocravennessphobe.

You manage to come out of this story worse than him.

I don’t care either if you’re banned, Field. However, I didn’t suggest you should be… only that your childish attempts to introduce to any thread the man who hob-nobs with Belgian fascists.

I seem to have racked up three censored posts this evening. This could be the fourth. So much for the HP slogan.

Anyway I agree with Nick SA – Islamocraven is quite a good antidote to Islamophobic.

Other possibles:

Shariah-pliant.

Mecca-Checker

Koranophile

Back on the topic of the post, I do hope you realise it is an anonymous smear at Derek Draper: the author is identified only by a unknown pseudonym. It is potentially actionable in several aspects.

I am surprised to see such a post here. It strikes me as problematic (to use a polite word) to denounce anonymous smears and then to post one yourself, however much you do not like the target or think he deserves the attack on his reputation.

Being a naive and trusting soul, who wouldn’t know the Labour Young Fabians from the Fine Young Cannibals, and who was initially fooled by both Dave Dudley and Poplar City Technology College, I trust this is another spoof post. Surely? If not, then Derek Draper needs to see a vet, pronto.

It is actionable even if it is a spoof.

an anonymous smear at Derek Draper: the author is identified only by a unknown pseudonym. It is potentially actionable in several aspects.

You could well be right, but what I find remarkable is that you suggest it. The idea that everything we say in Britain these days is reduced to how more or less ‘actionable’ (what an awful term) it is, is terribly sad. That you can be extradited for saying such and such or arrested for saying something else.

It used to be that you took care if you smelt bacon to watch what you had to say, but now one has to cast a watchful eye over one’s shoulder in case some cad takes umbrage and tells tales.

The days of duelling were far more honourable.

As a matter of fact I took it from Conan Doyle – the conclusion of “A Case of Identity” in “The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes”.

(SPOILER ALERT – in this story it is said by the culprit that his behaviour is not actionable; Holmes agrees, but then attempts to horsewhip the culprit instead. What Boris Johnson might call a ‘Homeric code of honour’, I suppose.)

While we are on the subject of smears, didn’t David Cameron’s wife share a flat with a member of the druggie rap-act Massive Attack?

trip hop isn’t rap. (Massive Attack)

Aren’t ‘acts’ involved in show business?

The Times
“McBride goes on to suggest that the website should spread rumours that pictures exist of Osborne “posing in a bra, knickers and suspenders” and “with his face ‘blacked up’ ”.

“He wouldn’t be the first student to do some cross-dress-ing at university…”

Why was Tony Blair called Antonia again?

Mark –

Thanks for the clarification. Rap was the closest I could get. I knew it wasn’t drum and bass. Can’t remember who it was she shared with. Might have been the Faithless bloke (he’s good by the way). BUt not sure.

The Osborne smear is a good one. As in effective. People are going to believe that one. But they won’t like the Cameron smears. Bad timing after the death of his child. Bit like “burying bad news”.

By the way, Brown and Co are compounding the error by trying to smear Guido F.

Brown – what was the term? psychologically defective?? – does not seem to understand just how serious this one is. The fact that McBride is trying to get away with a non-apology is particularly damaging. People don’t like that. They can also see (a) he’s NOT a juvenile or a pretty female and (b) he IS (or was) a senior adviser to our PM.

Field,

Yet you couldn’t even be bothered to defend your smear of Wilders.

As I remember it Field, you suggested I had smeared Wilders by not attacking someone else’s opinion of him.

The tale told by Moggy is worthy of Penthouse Forum of blessed memory. Well done! Really top-shelf-of-the-newsagent’s! Got any more, Moggy?

Is *field* working in advertising? Mecca-checka is brilliant, although it OUGHT to be Makkah-checka or Madinah-hyena, maybe [?]

Is this an online Creative Writing class? The Taffy of Canterbury is a well-known Shariaphile. To refer to the “the Shariaphilic tendency” of certain journalists and politicians is a neat expression, and for that matter so is Mosque-whipped [as in 'pussywhipped," an American term used to describe a certain kind of cowed male in a majority-female workplace.]

My goodness, I’m proud to run with such an avant-garde crowd, believe me!

Why can’t DC be this much fun?

Time to immigrate, I think.

articles like this make me think that this blogsite is just some naff gossip column for about 5 cleeky arseholes who have all told each other this same story on the phone already, I have never heard of the subject of this story and after I wikipediad his name i found out that’s because he’s a nobody.

The thing i regret most is that i actually wasted part of my life reading it and even more writing this comment, this after an article criticising labour for wanting to smear tories really classy HP

Dear Lord, this is a heck of a thing to read on an early Sunday in Sydney Oz. We were all young once, but how many of us were ever as stupid as this snotty and undeservingly righteous bint? You were the one in Draper’s bedroom – and now you’re out of the woodwork about it. Stay classy. Urgh.

BC –

At least Moggy won’t have caused the pages to stick together here!
Well, not unless you’ve been printing off!!

Mo-whipped?

Talking of whips, I was going to say apropos Moggy’s story:

“Sticks and stones may break my bones,
But whips and chains will certainly damage my political career.”

WB –

I think a lot hinges on just how attractive Moggy is/was.

We might find it in our hearts to forgive her indiscretion if she were seriously hot.

an anonymous smear at Derek Draper: the author is identified only by a unknown pseudonym. It is potentially actionable in several aspects.

You could well be right, but what I find remarkable is that you suggest it. The idea that everything we say in Britain these days is reduced to how more or less ‘actionable’ (what an awful term) it is, is terribly sad. That you can be extradited for saying such and such or arrested for saying something else.

And I find it sad that being described as possibly a bisexual who isn’t exclusive to his girlfriend and has the wit to excite women with a short conversation is considered a smear.

I would say that from this article he stands accused of being interesting.

Moggy, what is your charge against this guy anyway? Are you simply shocked and appalled by his drug habit (which is the only crime of his that you reveal here) or was your nose put out of joint because when you first agreed to engage in the S&M session and cheat on your boyfriend you thought you were special to him? Aren’t you in fact lucky that he didn’t press charges against your boyfriend for the kicking?

It’s interesting to see how the vermin swimming in the cesspool of sleaze politics and careerist hatchet jobs point their moralizing fingers while blissfully unaware of the coat of slime dripping from them.

“There Is No Place in Politics for the Dissemination or Publication of Material of This Kind” (C) Gordon Brown.

Lovely.

“There Is No Place in Politics for the Dissemination or Publication of Material of This Kind” (C) Gordon Brown.

I assume he’s talking about the Lisbon Constitution Treaty…er Constitutional Treaty?

Can I still say “johncraven”?

It’s interesting to see how the vermin swimming in the cesspool of sleaze politics and careerist hatchet jobs point their moralizing fingers while blissfully unaware of the coat of slime dripping from them.

If I may be forgiven a Blackadderism: the ability of some commenters to miss the point, when it is standing a foot in front of them wearing a t-shirt reading “I AM THE POINT”, patiently explaining to them exactly what the point is, and pointing a pointy thing, never fails to bemuse and amuse me.

Assuming Moggy is telling a reasonably true story, then sure it’s actionable, but Draper loses in every conceivable way by taking action.
I kinda like islamocraven.
At school in the very early fifties, food was provided be a company called Mecca; it was of course called meccamuck, a word that could get you seriously damaged these days.
As to whips and chains…………………..thought that was as british as cucumber sandwiches…………

It is a rather sweet story

I can’t see anything ‘actionable’ in it!

If I may be forgiven a Blackadderism: the ability of some commenters to miss the point, when it is standing a foot in front of them wearing a t-shirt reading “I AM THE POINT”, patiently explaining to them exactly what the point is, and pointing a pointy thing, never fails to bemuse and amuse me.

Good for you. He’s a scumbag, she’s a scumbag. They’re all scumbags.

I just realised: Armando Iannucci and chums must be rubbing their hands in glee that all this comes out just as ‘In The Loop’ goes on general release.

Or are they actually dismayed that once again reality proves to be sadder, sleazier and more absurdly shambolic than comedy?

I’ll just wait in the street while the horrid coked up motormouth tries to get his leg over you.

Just one thing to clarify, what’s I cut a little bit off both of them so we could all have some.
A euphemism for?

Are (presumably attractive) 19 year old women really that gormless and suggestible ? In addition to the apparently limitless expenses no wonder people are keen on becoming politicians. Good on old Dolly for making hay I say. I detect no revulsion other than hurt feelings.
Nevertheless the story sounds as truthful to me as your average MP’s aforementioned expense claims.

Haster: ‘It used to be that you took care if you smelt bacon to watch what you had to say’

More of this please

David T, stories like this have a place – but I’m not sure that here is the right one. If I choose to, I too can read NOTW, Guido, etc.

trip hop isn’t rap. (Massive Attack)

It is crap though. As is MA. Both employ rappers, MC’s declaiming their wealth and power over the ‘hood’ (if ever-so-tastefully with string arrangements in MA’s case) whilst claiming, through trite polemic, to speak for the communidee.

Back on topic: pass the popcorn! I’m minded of rats eating their own.

The moral must be beware of students bearing fillet steak… What are students doing with fillet blooming steak? That’d have been my student food budget for a week. Perhaps safe to conclude these labour hacks and I have very different backgrounds.

I am surprised to see such a post here. It strikes me as problematic (to use a polite word) to denounce anonymous smears and then to post one yourself, however much you do not like the target or think he deserves the attack on his reputation.

Exactly. Shouldn’t you be flogging this little anecdote to News of the World sweetie? (Moggy, bless, how cute). I’d hate to think you weren’t being paid for your boasting.

girlfriend Charlotte Raven (hatchet faced Myra Hindley lookalike) to tie him up and call him a naughty little boy.

Now that should really get you a nice little regular column slagging off any female that crosses your path for her cellulite or what have you. You go girl!

he wanted to take me to the Atlantic first because he’s such a naff, arriviste northern monkey he thought that was classy

Though I would definitely drop that slightly snobby tone if you want the News of the Screws to give you that column. And people might start guffawing about you being the arbiter of good taste or what have you.

It is a rather sweet story .

This blog really is turning into the toubeloid.

This has got to be a spoof, right? We all know that young women can be shallow, fickle, and self-serving … but as much as this? Holy Christ. And what the hell is it doing on Harry’s Place?

I agree with others who say, if true, this is:

[*] An admission of impulsive cheating on her b/f with an unknown quantity. I hope contraception was used;

[*] Potential admission of attempting criminal entrapment;

[*] B/f, whilst engaged in the previous point, proceeds to commit assault and battery.

(From a personal point of view, any 19 year old I fancied when I was 19 and not-19 would most certainly have *not* be flattered by smut from pervy old man.)

As my post today on the third estate suggests the blogosphere in general is geared towards anonymous smearing. Worth thinking about before we get on our high horses.

the man who hob-nobs with Belgian fascists

All I could find on the subject (and I’m Dutch) are two Wilders interviews in Haaretz, 11 months apart.

January 11, 2008:
PVV detractors call it a xenophobic entity, drawing parallels between Wilders and Jean-Marie Le Pen in France. Wilders says PVV will never associate itself with xenophobic parties abroad.
“Vlaams Belang in Belgium has a history of anti-Semitism. They have since stopped making these sounds, and some say it’s to court Jewish voters concerned with Islam,” Wilders says about the far-right Flemish party.

And December 18, 2008:
Wilders also revealed that if his Party for Freedom – which occupies nine of the Dutch parliament’s 150 seats – runs in European parliamentary elections, he may join Vlaams Belang to form a larger right-wing bloc. Wilders had previously said he would not consider such an alliance.
Belgium’s Jewish leadership has boycotted Vlaams Belang, citing its “strong anti-Semitic characteristics,” and in an interview with Haaretz last year, Wilders cited this in explaining his decision to distance himself from the party.
But now, he said, “there are different sounds coming from Vlaams Belang. Some people say they have changed, even from the Jewish community.
“That they have changed their tune. Others say they haven’t. I have to look into it and talk to people and study it more. I’m not saying it is impossible.”
However, he added, “we will not ally ourselves with parties like that of France’s Jean-Marie Le Pen.”

I wouldn’t call that hobnobbing with Vlaams Belang. Mr Wilders seems to prefer factual investigation over hearsay and propaganda. And I trust that he has found by now that, under its public façade, the rank and file of Dewinter’s party is deeply racist and antisemitic. I would be bitterly disappointed if any kind of alliance between PVV and VB were to be formed. But I don’t expect this to happen.

Thanks Dutch Boy.

Even assuming he did make such an alliance I think it is highly questionable that an elected democrat under sentence of death from a violent totalitarian movement should be refused entry to this country. He might be wrong in those circumstances, but the Voltairian principle should apply unless there is proper evidence that he has come here to stir up hatred. Exposing the totalitarian nature of Islam is not the same as stirring up hatred, even though it might result in some people feeling hate for Wilders and others feeling negative towards Islam.

If we are going to be so thin-skinned as to not allow any controversial opinions to be aired then we are witnessing the death of free speech.

It is crap though. As is MA. Both employ rappers, MC’s declaiming their wealth and power over the ‘hood’ (if ever-so-tastefully with string arrangements in MA’s case) whilst claiming, through trite polemic, to speak for the communidee.

That is without exception the single most embarrassing paragraph I have ever read in my entire life.

I’m tempted to start a new topic on Harry’s Place Arts just for you to expand on your theories about Massive Attack, Infradog. What do you say?

Reading these comments, I’m not enjoying seeing my opinion of Brits confirmed – every bit as uptight as I expect. Americans aren’t much better btw. But still, it is a bit disheartening.

Uptightness with a rich seam of misogyny running through it for the most part, too, Josh.

But you don’t really think you can count HP commenters as representative of the British population at large, do you?

But you don’t really think you can count HP commenters as representative of the British population at large, do you?

Why not? I mean this isn’t about the usual topics.

…with a rich seam of misogyny running through it…

Yeah, Americans hate men and male sexuality. Brits seem more even handed and despise humanity as a whole as far as I can tell.

What a bazaar thread.

“Are (presumably attractive) 19 year old women really that gormless and suggestible ?”

Some are. This one sure is. And that’s just Muggs.

Dutch Boy -
The orthodoxy here is that Wilders is “racist”. If you point out that this is nonsense, you are a marked bunny.

I have already said that I behaved like a stupid slut, and I was quite open about why I got annoyed and wanted to do him over, so to all these people going “well I think she comes out this looking awful” or “what a stupid slut” or “I deduce that she tried to stitch him up because of sour grapes” – I say “I KNOW – I already said that”.

And to those who think it is made up, I mean seriously – how could you make something like that up? Why would you make something like that up? I had a bloke from Private Eye ring me up because the story had got out (I was never exactly discreet) – I think somone told John Prescott’s son. The man from Private Eye said that the Sun had the story and were going to run it and would I like to do a spoiler with them. I said no so they ran it blind and got it mostly wrong.

Here’s a quote from a Guardian piece about him on his wikipedia page :

“Private Eye published a story about a “member of Blair’s kitchen cabinet” getting involved in threesomes, bondage and cocaine. They called him “Mr X” but the euphemism was quite unnecessary. In the Blairs’ suite at party conference, Cherie greeted Derek with a knowing smile, “Ahh, look who it is – Mr X.’”

It’s about what happened that night, but there wasn’t a threesome – in fact again, if you read what I’ve written I didn’g go any further than snogging him – but when Charlotte Raven heard about me she did get me on the phone and ask me if I would like to have a threesome with them. I said no.

I can’t say I regret being such a twit. I think young people should do daft things, and I still think the story is hilarious.

I can say with my hand on my heart that I learned absolutely nothing from the experience.

EdwardT @ 11 April 2009, 10:25 pm

“DavidT – Then please suggest a suitable adjective for a party which (with a few honourable exceptions such as Blears) is under the thumb of the Islamist/SWP alliance”

That party was called RESPECT and the remains of it still are.

I see we’re hosting nutters corner in this thread, tonight

The Daily Express (6 April 2009) presciently analyses Draper’s aura:

“It’s interesting to find so much blue in your aura. This indicates excellent written and verbal communication skills but can also be indicative of someone who is unable to face the world. Obviously communication is important to your job but you are much better at written skills than talking to others. On a personal and emotional level you are quite shy and a bit hesitant about expressing what you feel. You often hold on to your anger or upset until it comes flooding out all at once,”

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/93570/Can-my-aura-really-reveal-the-future-

I can’t say I regret being such a twit. I think young people should do daft things, and I still think the story is hilarious.

tell them to go fuck themselves Mogg (and then bathe happily in the glory of showing how normal life is never reflected in the comments boxes of political blogs.)

What a bazaar thread.

and yet…no home made jam at all…

tell them to go fuck themselves Mogg

Abso-fucking-lutely. I thought I’d stumbled onto the Daily Mail letters page for a while there.

Analysing the comments on Moggy’s story under various different headings is kinda interesting….

1. She is a snob.

•”Good heavens, the barbarity of the provincials! How fortunate that you are a Socialist and accept the foibles of these poor unfortunates.”
•”This is extremely offensive and I can’t imagine you’d get away with substituting a nationality for ‘northern’ without cries of ‘racist’…”

2. She is a liar

•”It is potentially actionable in several aspects.”
•”I trust this is another spoof post.”

3. We don’t want this sort of filth here

•”stories like this have a place – but I’m not sure that here is the right one.”
•”articles like this make me think that this blogsite is just some naff gossip column for about 5 cleeky arseholes who have all told each other this same story on the phone already,”

4. She is a whore; are all women really whores as well?

•”You manage to come out of this story worse than him.”
•”The tale told by Moggy is worthy of Penthouse Forum of blessed memory. Well done! Really top-shelf-of-the-newsagent’s! Got any more, Moggy?”
•”We were all young once, but how many of us were ever as stupid as this snotty and undeservingly righteous bint? You were the one in Draper’s bedroom – and now you’re out of the woodwork about it. Stay classy. Urgh.”
•”It’s interesting to see how the vermin swimming in the cesspool of sleaze politics and careerist hatchet jobs point their moralizing fingers while blissfully unaware of the coat of slime dripping from them.”
•”Are (presumably attractive) 19 year old women really that gormless and suggestible ? In addition to the apparently limitless expenses no wonder people are keen on becoming politicians.”
•”This has got to be a spoof, right? We all know that young women can be shallow, fickle, and self-serving … but as much as this? Holy Christ. And what the hell is it doing on Harry’s Place? (scores under three areas)”
•”[*] An admission of impulsive cheating on her b/f with an unknown quantity. I hope contraception was used; [*] Potential admission of attempting criminal entrapment; [*] B/f, whilst engaged in the previous point, proceeds to commit assault and battery. (From a personal point of view, any 19 year old I fancied when I was 19 and not-19 would most certainly have *not* be flattered by smut from pervy old man.)”

5. Is she a whore I can fantasise about?

•”I think a lot hinges on just how attractive Moggy is/was. We might find it in our hearts to forgive her indiscretion if she were seriously hot.”

6. What exactly are you whining about, stupid whore?

•”Moggy, what is your charge against this guy anyway? Are you simply shocked and appalled by his drug habit (which is the only crime of his that you reveal here) or was your nose put out of joint because when you first agreed to engage in the S&M session and cheat on your boyfriend you thought you were special to him? Aren’t you in fact lucky that he didn’t press charges against your boyfriend for the kicking?”"
“He’s a scumbag, she’s a scumbag. They’re all scumbags.”
•”Good on old Dolly for making hay I say. I detect no revulsion other than hurt feelings.”

Oh Dear.

“I thought I’d stumbled onto the Daily Mail letters page for a while there.”

No, but here is Peter MacKay:

“Number 10 email scandal: Brown’s to blame for this poison”

Political madness gone correct!

re Moggy’s explanation I always think it’s rather funny that there are all around the country millions of provincial, conventionally minded Labour Party supporters but the people who control the party are the Dribergs and Foots and Drapers and Mandelsons and Whelans – people whose moral compass needles would appear rather erratic to most of those supporters.

It’s great though that the squeaky clean GMTV image has had a great pile of stinky stuff poured all over it courtesy of Draper and McBride.

Yes, Las Locas, I do have a personal opinion. It can be separated from the potential of high risk sex with S.T.Is to consider. It can mostly definitely be separated from the potential admission of blackmail and, in pursuit of aiding and abetting such a criminal act, physical assault.

You express an opinion on everyone but Moggy. D’you have an opinion on her or are you simply taking the aloof holier-than-thou position of professional whiners?

Alec, how many times do I have to say that no sex happened?

Oh sorry, there was the “potential for high risk sex” and “potential” for some other shit…. There was probably “potential” for me to murder him, rob his flat and shit on his rug but it didn’t happen so I don’t see why you are going on about it.

Ah, my apologies, Moggy. However, on re-reading the material which was available to me when I first spoke, I see something about the “time of your assignation”, which isn’t a crystal clear admission of no sex taking place.

But, even though you contemplated it (same goes my views on Draper and McBride, even though they didn’t publish), you didn’t, so you didn’t. Had you, my opinions would have been a personal choice which, had you not wished to hear, you should not have publicized this story.

There was probably “potential” for me to murder him, rob his flat and shit on his rug but it didn’t happen so I don’t see why you are going on about it.

Is this where he got the excuse for the e-mails not being published??? I didn’t suggest you’d contemplated that. I suggested that you’d considered luring him into compromising positions over what is a legal activity, and then using it to damage his career. Furthermore, you state that your b/f committed physical assault against him.

Back to what KB Player (who, for the avoidance of doubt, is female) said.

What does she say? Let’s see.

a). That I want to be a columnist for the News of the World.

b). That I have some sort of interest in earning money from this story.

c). That I am boasting.

None of which is even near accurate – I have no desire to be a columnist, if I wanted money I would have sold the story (duh) rather than put it here, and as I’ve said loads of times and in many different ways on this page but I will repeat for the wilfully obtuse – I was not boasting. And regarding Charlotte Raven – I didn’t realise that having a fully developed aesthetic sensibility makes me a bad member of ‘the sisterhood’.

Ah … some people still think that saying “Daily Mail” trumps all arguments and immediately wins the debate.

Women fighting!

~*stir*~ ~*stir*~ ~*stir*~

NO SCAT ON HP !

Some readers of this stimulating thread will have been bitterly appalled and disappointed to read Moggy suggesting – even playfully – that she could, had she so desired, have taken a dump on the naff northern oik Derek Draper’s rug [an immensely valuable 17th-Century Bokhari with hunting scenes, greatly coveted by the V&A.]

Mercifully, she did not lower her dungarees and M&S knickers and do this dreadful deed but the very suggestion that she might have done so had the whim struck her at the time has made many of us think of the possibility and, worse, visualise it as vividly as if a tusted confidante were to suggest that the Harperson was once videotaped cornholing Mandelson with a strap-on dildo at a Labour Party social gathering [this is untrue as far as I know.]

Those of us who find scat profoundly unappealing have sustained mental damage as a result of reading this vile filth and visualising Moggy’s distasteful might-have-had-I-so-desired fantasy.

We need help at once. Does anyone know a good psychotherapist?

The misspelled word in ‘tusted confidante’ was a typo. It should have read ‘trusted,’ as you probably guessed.

It was not a fire-new newly-cointed portmanteau* word referring to either tushy-licking or fisting in the simple past tense, interesting though the suggestion might be.

* Lewis Carroll

This is great stuff! Is it always like this ’round here? Consider me hooked, and please keep up all the salaciousness.

The funniest thread ever. It put a smile on my face.

That was a dull read.

None of which is even near accurate

Well, the literal meets the ironic, with sounds of oh? really!! I wasn’t attempting to be accurate. I was being sarcastic and insulting, both to you and to whoever thought it would be a good idea to post this kind of tripe on this blog.