Mote-Beam Scenario At New Statesman
The New Statesman has published a footling story with a rather exciting headline:
Exclusive: easyJet grounds in-flight magazine after Holocaust gaffe
What sort of terrible ‘gaffe’ could this be? Hold onto your hats! Apparently, easyjet published “a tasteless fashion shoot at the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin”. Shock horror!
In a statement to the New Statesman, the airline said:
“easyJet profusely apologises to anyone who may be offended by the inappropriate fashion photo shoot at the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin featured in this month’s issue of the in-flight magazine.”
“The magazine is produced by INK — an external publishing house, and easyJet were not aware of the images until they appeared in print. As a consequence we are now reviewing our relationship with the publisher and are withdrawing this month’s issue from all flights.”
“easyJet prides itself on bringing together a wide range of cultures and beliefs and is appalled by this insensitive and inconsiderate photo-shoot, the aim of which was to highlight some of Berlin’s iconic landmarks and certainly no offence was meant.”
It doesn’t sound like a particularly big deal to me, but evidently the New Statesman are very proud of themselves for their major scoop.
Here’s another scoop. The New Statesman recently published a sympathetic interview with Hamas leader, Khaled Meshal.
Meshal’s Hamas describes the Holocaust as “a lie invented by the Zionists“. Its Constitution is a litany of racist lies about Jews, many of them drawn from the Protocols. You’ll find no mention of this in the New Statesman article, even though the most recent instance of Hamas Holocaust denial had taken place only a couple of weeks previously.
New Statesman must be very proud that easyjet is ‘reviewing its relationship with the publisher’. I expect it is less pleased to see how many of its former readers are, ahem, reviewing their own relationship with the New Statesman.
Comments
| 20 November 2009, 11:24 pm |
There are those who might be tempted to argue that the views of an interview subject shouldn’t be taken to be representative of the views of the publication in which the interview’s published, particularly when said interview is done in a question-and-answer format, without any commentary on the subject’s responses. But I guess that’s just crazy talk.
| 20 November 2009, 11:30 pm |
Published any softball interviews with Nick Griffn recently:
“Mr Griffin – what are your hopes for the future?”
| 20 November 2009, 11:34 pm |
So the poor old Staggers is now down to 23,000 (link in Alan A’s final paragraph). Fifty years ago, under Kingsley Martin, it was 80,000.
| 20 November 2009, 11:46 pm |
the views of an interview subject shouldn’t be taken to be representative of the views of the publication in which the interview’s published, particularly when said interview is done in a question-and-answer format, without any commentary on the subject’s responses
Evidently you have failed to grasp that it is not the mere appearance of Meshal in the magazine, but the very nature of the questions he was asked, that are at issue here. Namely – a sympathetic and soft-pedalling approach to a Holocaust denier.
Try again.
| 21 November 2009, 12:10 am |
How dare you criticise Khaled Meshal you fetid Cohenist scum. He combines the Jew hatred of Himmler with the well groomed facial hair of John Rees. He’s fucking perfect.
| 21 November 2009, 12:16 am |
There are those who might argue that Owen is a gullible little shit.
| 21 November 2009, 12:21 am |
Wow, I’m being parodied. What an honour!
| 21 November 2009, 12:24 am |
Ever since they continued to employ the guy who called all us non-muslims “sheep” (along with other questionable remarks), I decided I would never buy it again or even visit their website. Now it’s only fit for toilet paper, I hope they’re quest to appear “multicultural” was worth it.
| 21 November 2009, 12:50 am |
I agree about the mote-beam point, since the NS is certainly not averse to jumping into bed with any old Holocaust denier and other assorted Jew-haters.
However, a fashion shoot at a Holocaust memorial is not a ‘footling’ story (I bet you waited 20 years for an opportunity to use that word. Well done!). It’s an indicator of how degenerate society has become.
| 21 November 2009, 12:54 am |
I’ve got pictures of my two young daughters clambering all over the Holocaust memorial. But that’s partly what it’s there for. It’s not just a show and tell piece of art; it’s meant to be interactive.
I spoke to my children, in very rough terms, about what it represented and they listened intently. Then they ran off and played hide and seek with their cousins for an hour.
When I first saw the the memorial, I thought it looked like the foundations of a multi-storey carpark. But it grew on me, quickly, so that by the end of the day I thought it terrific. I never made into the museum, though. It’s difficult to get a 3 and 6 year old into a museum on their holidays.
| 21 November 2009, 1:34 am |
I was offended by this magazine feature. This issue will have been the one on their first flights to Israel (a new route for EasyJet). I wrote to them about this last week. Here’s what they said to me:
Thank you for your email to Andy Harrison, our Chief Executive Officer. The e-mail has been passed to me for a response. I apologise for not being able to answer to your e-mail immediately.
I am grateful for the number of comments that you have made regarding the November issue of our easyJet Traveller Magazine. Please be sure that your opinion is highly appreciated.
I would like to apologise if you have felt offended by the content of ‘Bauhaus Vunder’ article. I would like to underline that it was never our intention to insult any of the readers.
Still, we do acknowledge your feedback and we are thankful to learn about the number of issues you have raised concern over.
I would like to advise that I have passed your comments to the editors of easyJet Traveller Magazine.
Thank you for contacting us. Please be assured that your correspondence has been noted by Mr Harrison.
Yours sincerely,
easyJet Executive Support Team
| 21 November 2009, 1:39 am |
Brownie- I do understand what you mean about the Memorial being designed for interaction, but the understanding of a child (even a bright child as I am sure yours are!) and an adul are very different and that difference determines what behaviour is appropriate. An adult clambering over a memorial and taking cheery holiday snaps would be inappropriate, likewise a fashion shoot.
I cannot fathom why anyone would not be able to realise that a photo shoot was inappropriate. I am not a clever or educated person, but you do not need to be either of those things to know instinctively that this was wrong.
I don’t have any time for NS they appear to have no shame or sense of irony.
| 21 November 2009, 8:10 am |
0
| 21 November 2009, 8:35 am |
Then they ran off and played hide and seek with their cousins for an hour.
They came back.
| 21 November 2009, 9:00 am |
Well, it’s either the Jews or the Muslims innit?
| 21 November 2009, 9:51 am |
The New Statesman: the magazine that sponsored Shlomo Sand’s booklaunch at Borders last week and whose literary editor chaired the SOAS meeting with Sand the next day which attracted antisemites ‘like fleas to a dog’………..
| 21 November 2009, 10:53 am |
Yeah, that’s right Arnold, but NS also bigged up the Euston Manifesto, since sunk without trace. I don’t know, whatever. If anyone is interested, NS is owned by the same guy who owns LabourHome, so clearly the evil antisemitic conspiracy is spreading. Shock, horror, etc.
| 21 November 2009, 11:47 am |
Something a little similar appeared in The Times travel section two weeks ago (7/11/09). An article on tourism in Berlin was illustrated using a picture of a laughing mother and daughter running among the memorial’s ’stelae’, with the rather curious caption ‘Moral maze’.
I have to say that I found the picture very unsettling at the time.
| 21 November 2009, 12:28 pm |
Can anyone understand the nonsense that “Amused” posts all the time? Is he claiming that there is no such thing as antisemitism? That it’s all in the mind?
| 21 November 2009, 12:39 pm |
Re amused and his constant foolishness…
“He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don’t let that fool you. He really is an idiot.
- Groucho Marx”
| 21 November 2009, 12:47 pm |
Gordon Bennet
Antisemitism surely does exist, but poor old HP is obsessed with Jews and Muslims like no other blog I know. It’s all about balance and perspective of which HP has none, thankfully.
Anyway, regarding NS: why not go to the top? The NS head honcho is a Labour supporting businessman of good repute, you know. Inform me of his reply – for my amusement, of course.
| 21 November 2009, 1:15 pm |
Why is a fashion shoot at a Holocaust memorial offensive? I don’t think anyone would care if a fashion shoot was in a graveyard or in front of a cenotaph.
I do understand though that Easyjet is a commercial enterprise so artistic freedom is not necessarily the primary issue, as with the Ryanair schoolgirl “scandal”.
| 21 November 2009, 1:48 pm |
Fatloser – a Holocaust memorial, particularly one in the capital city of the country which perpetrated the most extensive attempt at genocide in modern times – is presumably designed to encourage people who visit it to reflect with sobriety upon the causes and circumstances under which such atrocities took place.
If you are incapable of understanding that to reduce that site to the level of a theme park or adventure playground through the frivolity of badly conceived advertising could be offensive not only to those who still live with the traumas of the Holocaust’s events, then I really do feel very sorry for you.
| 21 November 2009, 2:07 pm |
I don’t think anyone would care if a fashion shoot was in a graveyard or in front of a cenotaph.
Really?
| 21 November 2009, 3:38 pm |
This was one of the images:
| 21 November 2009, 3:42 pm |
Sure Owen. And when will the New Statesman be interviewing Nick Griffin? They won’t? Why not?
| 21 November 2009, 4:50 pm |
Imo the Holocaust Memorial story is a little bigger than a mote, but certainly “freebie magazine sends self-absorbed airheads to do fashion shoot” is hardly the scoop of the century. So: if you’re Jewish the NS is your friend when it can earn some easy anti-racist brownie points. Just not when somebody actually hates you and wants to kill you.
| 21 November 2009, 7:03 pm |
Antisemitism surely does exist, but poor old HP is obsessed with Jews and Muslims like no other blog I know. It’s all about balance and perspective of which HP has none, thankfully.
You know where the door is. If not, all you need to do is ask.
Anyway, regarding NS: why not go to the top? The NS head honcho is a Labour supporting businessman of good repute, you know.
I refer you to Groucho Marx’s comment, as quoted by Doc. You have it arse backwards. The head honcho first needs to earn this supposed ‘good repute’ by not allowing the NS to jump into bed with antisemites.
| 21 November 2009, 10:16 pm |
I saw the article 2 weeks ago on a flight to Majorca and thought it rather tasteless,a bit like eating fish and chips at the Menin Gate whilst ‘Taps’ was played.
We all need to be reminded of the horrors endured by humanity down the ages and this article showed that many people are unaware of the suffering of Jewry and others during the war.
Difficult to beleive but true
| 22 November 2009, 3:59 pm |
Ronbo2571, you are correct. It’s all to do with treating something the respect and sobriety it deserves, even many years after the event took place. It is hard for me to believe that anyone cannot see why this is offensive, and while I am not big fan of the New Statesman, and I also don’t think that this EasyJet magazine mistake was the worst thing we Jews have to worry about (sadly), for me it was sad and shocking to see, and that’s why I wrote to the airline when I saw it. We need to act when we see things like this, especially if we suspect the person / people who made the mistake didn’t do so intentionally: it is those people who we can educate more easily, and they are the ones most likely to change and help us turn the tide of rising antisemitism. It is in fact the *lack* of intent or malice that makes it all the more worth saying something, I think.
| 23 November 2009, 12:41 am |
Alan A, November 20th 2009, 10:48 pm
“The New Statesman has published a footling story”
My copu of the Staggers arrives in Friday’s post (usually) after I’ve left for work. This is unhelpful, since I used to read it during Friday lunch.
This week’s is in the car, unopened, with a view to reading, as usual, during Monday lunchtime.
Some of us just can’t keep pace with virtual reality.


footling story
Sorry, but you’ll have to explain in what sense the story was inconsequential…this was a major scoop for the Statesman, and should secure at least another 3 subscribers!!